All Research
Conference Paper

Digital Provenance & the Aerospace Bill of Materials

Architectural patterns for cryptographic provenance applied to safety-critical aerospace components.

Author · NASCII ResearchStatus · Forthcoming · 2026Read · 11 min read

Why provenance, and why now

Software has converged on the SBOM as a baseline provenance artifact. Hardware — and aerospace hardware in particular — is starting to demand the same level of verifiable history for safety-critical components.

Architectural patterns

We examine three patterns for cryptographic provenance: signed event streams, anchored Merkle logs and registry-mediated attestations. Each is evaluated for tamper-evidence, supplier burden and integration with existing PLM and ERP systems.

Adoption path

Provenance succeeds when it is a byproduct of normal operations, not an additional reporting burden. We outline an adoption path that starts with high-risk component classes and scales as supplier tooling matures.

This article is a preview of forthcoming NASCII research. The full publication will be released as part of the 2026 research program.